Open to remote AI implementation roles

Deekshak SS

I build AI systems teams can actually run. Multi-agent workflows, RAG, and production automation for messy ops problems.

Fewer notebook demos. More approval gates and things you can click. Start with Business OS, the flagship.

Multi-agentRAGProductionAutomation
Deekshak SS
Production AIOrchestrationMulti-agent
Scroll to proof
Proof · Flagship

See it live: Business OS

Watch the walkthrough, open the live app, or expand a product screenshot. Multi-agent system with dense RAG vaults, not a naked chat wrapper.

Product walkthrough

~2 min · strategist → plan lock → specialists → outputs

Multi-agent · Production · 2026

A live multi-agent product. You bring a messy problem; it locks a plan, runs specialist agents, and hands back paste-ready work.

Problem
Most business AI chat dumps ideas and stops. Teams still need a path from a fuzzy request to an approved plan and real artifacts they can use.
Build
Strategist RAG is grounded in a high-density Hormozi vault (3 books + 12 playbooks) and routes to a Copy specialist on a Copy OS vault (14 vault docs, 112 frameworks, 600+ swipe files). Human plan lock, then specialists draft. FastAPI on Modal, React on Vercel, Chroma retrieval.
Result
Public demo at app.deekshak.site. Plans cite real frameworks instead of generic LLM fluff. Open it live from this page.
  • Grok Build
  • RAG
  • Multi-agent
  • Chroma
  • Modal
  • Vercel
Open liveGitHub

Behind the scenes

High-density knowledge, not empty RAG

Most demos bolt a model onto a thin prompt. Business OS is built so the strategist and copy specialist pull from curated corpora with real depth: frameworks, playbooks, templates, and checklists you can measure. That is what makes plan lock and specialist drafts feel like implementation work instead of generic AI chat.

Strategist knowledge

Hormozi growth systems vault

The Business Strategist retrieves from a structured Hormozi corpus: offers, leads, money models, and growth playbooks. Not a thin prompt. A real knowledge base the plan is supposed to cite.

  • 3

    core books

  • 12

    implementation playbooks

  • Dozens

    lead, sales, retention systems

Domains: grand-slam offers, lead machines, sales and retention systems, profit models.

Copy specialist knowledge

Copy OS persuasion vault

When a plan routes to Copywriting, the specialist is grounded in a high-density copy vault. Frameworks, templates, checklists, and real swipe examples, not freeform model prose.

  • 14

    in-depth vault docs

  • 112

    named frameworks

  • 32

    structures and templates

  • 58

    checklists and QA

  • 600+

    swipe and example files

  • 40+

    authors and sources

Sources span classic and modern persuasion (Hopkins, Schwartz, Cialdini, Ogilvy, Kennedy, Brunson, Hormozi, and more).

Selected work

Proof you can open · systems you can understand

If it has a UI or canvas, you get a snapshot, and a live link when one exists. If it only ran in the background on calendars, messages, or job queues, I explain how it worked. No fake product screens.

AI Agents2026

Business OS

A live multi-agent product. You bring a messy problem; it locks a plan, runs specialist agents, and hands back paste-ready work.

  • Plan lock and human approval
  • Dense Hormozi + Copy OS RAG
  • Specialist agent execution
  • Clickable production demo
  • Grok Build
  • RAG
  • Multi-agent
  • Chroma
  • Modal
Open liveGitHub
n8n2025 to 2026

AI BDR / GTM Engine

Outbound in one canvas: enrich the agency, scrape Apollo, create Instantly campaigns, verify email.

  • Agency and ICP enrichment
  • Apollo scrape into Airtable leads
  • Instantly campaign plus email verify
  • n8n
  • Apollo
  • Airtable
  • Instantly
  • Emailable
GitHub
n8n2025 to 2026

AI Email + RAG Responder

Inbox in, summarize, classify, draft from your docs, review, then send. Grounded email automation.

  • Docs vectorized into Qdrant
  • Classify and grounded draft
  • Review step before send
  • n8n
  • IMAP
  • Qdrant
  • Google Drive
  • OpenAI
GitHub
n8n2025 to 2026

HubSpot Enrich + Outreach

New CRM contact, scrape social, merge profile data, AI-personalize, send from Gmail.

  • HubSpot-triggered enrich
  • Social profile scrape and merge
  • Personalized Gmail send
  • n8n
  • HubSpot
  • Phantombuster
  • OpenAI
  • Gmail
GitHub
n8n2025 to 2026

AI Lead Research Engine

Sheet of leads in, company research agent, AI sales draft, send when you trigger the link.

  • Per-lead company research
  • AI sales email draft
  • Sheet-driven send control
  • n8n
  • Google Sheets
  • Groq
  • Web search
  • AI Agent
GitHub

Shadow and supporting systems

Built to run without a homepage

Plenty of agentic and ops work never gets a pretty product page. It fires on events, writes logs, and messages people in tools they already use. These cards document that work as it actually ran.

AutomationLate 2025Shadow agent · explained

Show-Rate Guardian

Revenue protection at the meeting layer. Score no-show risk, pick channel and timing, follow up without someone babysitting every booking.

Problem

Booked sales calls no-show. Generic reminders ignore risk, timing, and channel. Every missed meeting is revenue you already paid to book.

How it works

This was never meant to be a product people open. It sat behind the calendar. When a meeting was booked, the agent scored how likely the lead was to no-show (history, source, lag to meeting, incomplete data). High risk got earlier or multi-touch reminders; low risk got a light touch. Messages went out through the usual messaging tools, and every decision landed in a run log so ops could audit later.

How it connects

Calendar or booking source, agent runtime, LLM scoring, SMS/email providers, then a spreadsheet or CRM log. Classic ops agent shape: event in, decision out, side effects on channels, no end-user dashboard.

Where it ran

Background agent in a Hermes environment with model APIs and calendar/message integrations. No public URL. Hermes is off my stack now; the design and loop still stand as implementation work.

Why no product screenshot

There was no single product screen. The UI was calendar notifications and messages people already get. Control plane was agent config and logs. After retiring Hermes, there is no live instance to open, so this card explains the architecture instead of faking a mockup.

  • Risk score drives channel and timing
  • Multi-channel reminder path
  • Outcome logged for ops review
  • Agent runtime (Hermes, retired)
  • LLMs
  • Calendar APIs
  • Messaging channels
  • Logs / Sheets
AILate 2025 to early 2026Full system · GitHub

Agency OS (Antigravity)

Autonomous outbound factory for Fractional CFOs. Golden Sheet and GDoc cloning at scale on Modal and Google Workspace, quality-first Profit Gap assets.

Problem

Spray-and-pray outbound kills boutique trust. fCFOs need hyper-personalized magnets and campaigns without a $25k/mo retainer.

How it works

Antigravity is the agent persona that runs Agency OS. Always read AGENTS, STATUS, and MEMORY before work. Production scripts (modal_verified_runner_turbo, verified_asset_generator) clone golden templates, personalize per lead, and write campaign-ready assets. Auth tokens refresh on a Modal volume shared by runners, never baked into images.

How it connects

Apollo-class lead sources into a Python/Modal factory, out to Google Sheets and Docs, then campaign ESP handoff. Agent skills cover lead generation, asset cloning, and session protocol.

Where it ran

Modal cloud for batch generation; Google Workspace as the asset plane; agent workspace on OpenCode/Antigravity. Public docs and scripts: github.com/Deekshak11/agency-os. Private full backup: Agency_OS.

Why no product screenshot

The product surface is batch jobs, Google assets, and agent context files, not one app window. Open GitHub for architecture, SOPs, and runners. The portfolio explains the system without leaking client lead data.

  • Profit Gap / Runway Analysis assets
  • Modal runners and OAuth volume
  • AGENTS / MEMORY / STATUS operating system
  • Python
  • Modal
  • Google Workspace APIs
  • Antigravity / OpenCode
  • Perplexity
AI Agents2026Infrastructure · GitHub

Signal OS / Agentic infrastructure

Always-on agentic infrastructure: Mission Control, Hermes runtime, Hindsight memory, hourly GitHub DR backups. First wedge was Show-Rate Guardian.

Problem

Solo operators need 24/7 agent ops with memory, skills, and restore-from-wipe resilience. A chat tab that forgets everything is not enough.

How it works

Signal OS is the always-on layer under product skills. Hermes (or equivalent) runs around the clock. Mission Control surfaces chat, kanban, and memory. Hindsight holds long-term graph memory. Skills like Show-Rate Guardian plug in as operator-facing wedges.

How it connects

Agent runtime, skills (Show-Rate and others), tools and APIs, Hindsight plus session capture, GitHub backup for disaster recovery.

Where it ran

Docker Compose historically on a VPS; public docs on github.com/Deekshak11/signal-os. Full runtime state stays in a private Agentic-OS backup.

Why no product screenshot

Ops surface is Mission Control and agent sessions, often private. Architecture docs and Show-Rate skills on GitHub are the hire-facing proof.

  • Mission Control and agent runtime
  • Hindsight memory graph
  • Hourly DR backup to GitHub
  • Hermes
  • Docker
  • Hindsight
  • Mission Control
  • GitHub backup
Automation2024 to early 2025Ops layer · explained

Automation foundations

Manual ops turned into composable workflows with retries and dead-letters. The boring reliability layer agents need later.

Problem

Hours lost to routing, notifications, and CRM upkeep. Early automations broke silently when APIs failed.

How it works

Classic iPaaS automation: event or schedule fires, transform, call systems of record, branch on status, retry transient errors, park poison messages. No LLM required. This is the boring half of production AI that keeps agents from becoming expensive chaos.

How it connects

Forms, CRMs, email, Slack/Teams, sheets, whatever ops already used. Workflows sat between SaaS tools as glue. Humans only touched exceptions.

Where it ran

n8n / Make / Zapier cloud (and later self-hosted n8n patterns). Credentials live in the automation platform, not in a custom app. Many flows were internal with no public domain.

Why no product screenshot

Dozens of small flows, not one flagship UI. Screenshots of client CRMs or private workspaces are not portable. The portable proof is the pattern: retries, dead-letters, explicit failure paths, described here.

  • Retries and dead-letters
  • Webhook and CRM plumbing
  • Reliability before agents
  • n8n
  • Make
  • Zapier
  • Webhooks
  • CRM
Web2025Collab · explained

TechYzer collaboration

Independent GTM and engagement loop for a growth offer: landing, research, content system. Not employment.

Problem

Fragmented positioning and no reliable path from stranger to qualified interest.

How it works

Not an agent product. A GTM loop. Research clarified who the offer was for. Landing converted cold traffic. Community and content kept prospects warm and filtered tire-kickers. Independent collaboration, not a W-2 role.

How it connects

Site or landing, analytics, content community, then manual or light-automated follow-up. Optional later glue to CRM and email tools.

Where it ran

Marketing site plus community platform (Skool-class). Standard web hosting. No custom agent backend.

Why no product screenshot

Client and collab surfaces and private community spaces are not ideal portfolio assets without clearance. The hire signal is the GTM loop design, stated clearly.

  • Positioning and landing
  • Research-backed messaging
  • Community engagement loop
  • GTM
  • Landing pages
  • Skool / community
  • Research
WebMid 2024Live sites

Client websites + local SEO

Fast AI-assisted marketing sites for SMBs. pantherfitness.in and k2salon.in, with local brand search strength.

Problem

Local businesses needed findable conversion sites without agency timelines or retainers.

How it works

Standard web delivery, sped up with AI-assisted build tools, then finished as real public sites. Focus was speed-to-live and local discoverability, not a custom backend.

How it connects

Standalone marketing sites. Optional Google Business and analytics. Not wired into the later agent stack.

Where it ran

Public web hosting for each client domain (for example pantherfitness.in). Open live where links still work.

Why no product screenshot

Live sites are the proof. Use Open live. No need for a frozen PNG when the real property is one click away, and client pages change over time.

  • SMB conversion pages
  • Local SEO foundations
  • Live client properties
  • Lovable
  • SEO
  • Web deploy
About

Why I build implementation, not slides

Deekshak SS

AI implementation · Orchestration

  • Production systems over demos that die in a notebook
  • Orchestration and approval gates, not unbounded agents
  • Every build maps to a number the business already tracks
  • Tool-agnostic. Pick whatever closes the loop.

Target

AI implementation

Mode

Remote

Proof

Live products

I look for roles where the brief is fuzzy and someone has to own the full loop. Find the real problem, wire models and tools, add human approval where it matters, and ship something ops can run.

Business OS is the flagship proof: strategist RAG on a dense Hormozi vault, copy specialist on a full Copy OS corpus, plan lock, live at app.deekshak.site. Around that sits meeting show-rate work, lead pipelines, and the reliability layer those agents need.

Stack is a means, not a brand. Agents, RAG, n8n-class automation, Modal, Vercel, whatever gets a production system online. If you evaluate on demos more than buzzwords, we should talk.

I keep formal courses light on purpose. Structure is useful, but the reality check of what works comes from building, shipping, iterating, and taking market feedback. Credentials are listed under Credentials. The portfolio above is still the main proof.

Stack

Skills backed by the work above

No skill bars. These show up in the case studies, not as a laundry list of every tool I ever touched.

01

Agentic build

  • Grok Build
  • Hermes
  • OpenAI Codex
  • Antigravity
  • Multi-agent
02

AI systems

  • RAG
  • LLM APIs
  • Eval loops
  • Human-in-the-loop
03

Automation

  • n8n
  • Make
  • Zapier
  • Webhooks
  • CRM
04

Deploy

  • Modal
  • Vercel
  • Docker
  • FastAPI
05

Product surface

  • React
  • TypeScript
  • REST
  • MCP
Credentials

Learning by shipping, not collecting badges

A short stack of verified courses. Secondary to live systems and case studies above.

I do not stack courses for the sake of a longer resume. Structured learning helps with vocabulary and frameworks, but the market only cares what survives contact with real workflows, bad data, and users. That feedback comes from building, shipping, iterating, and putting work in front of people. Credentials below are useful baselines. The case studies and live demos are the proof.

How I work

Short loop until the number moves

How I approach AI implementation on a team. Not a consulting sales funnel.

01

Problem

Find what's actually broken, not only what was asked for.

02

Prototype

Cheapest path that could work under production conditions.

03

Harden

Approval gates, retries, observability. Silent failures are bugs.

04

Ship + measure

Deploy, demo, and map it to a number the business already tracks.

Why hire me

For teams that need an owner, not another chatbot

What you get on an AI implementation team: ownership of outcomes, not a tool list.

01

I ship systems, not prompts.

Live products and workflows with gates, retries, and demos. That is the bar for implementation roles.

02

I close the loop.

Diagnose, prototype, harden, measure. Silent failures are bugs, not model quirks.

03

I speak ops and product.

Every build maps to a metric teams already track: show rate, lead quality, time to artifact.

Contact

Hiring for AI implementation?

Best fit is remote AI implementation, agent orchestration, or automation engineering. Roles where someone owns the loop from a fuzzy brief to a system that actually runs in production.

Start with the proof

Available remote, India and international. Prefer teams that evaluate on demos and ownership, not keyword bingo.